| <prev | back to index | next> |
| Issue Date | 21.02.2000 - AMIEL 13.03.2000 - SMD 20.12.2000 - NewVision |
| ID |
Michel: 29.1-32.1 (SMD: MSPost VE 50),
29.2-32.2 (AMIEL: SIMA 1020),
29.2-32.2 (NewVision: Epost 2000); Scott: N/A; Stanley Gibbons: ?; Yvert et Tellier: ?; Category: pR |
| Design | artwork: Jose Projecto, stamps design: Mariana Santos |
| Stamps in set | 4 self-adhesive ATM labels |
| Value |
Esc 50 / €0.25 : Esc 350 / € 1.75 - Sauropod with footprints Esc 50 / €0.25 : Esc 350 / € 1.75 - Lourinhasaurus Esc 50 / €0.25 : Esc 350 / € 1.75 - Dacentrurus Esc 50 / €0.25 : Esc 350 / € 1.75 - Allosaurus |
| Emission/Type | ATM |
| Places of issue | Lisbon. Porto, Coimbra, Evora e Faro, Lourinha |
| Size (width x height) | 55 mm x 30 mm |
| Layout | strip of 4 self-adhesive labels |
| Products | Any FDC or additional philatelic product was produced by Portuguese Post. |
| Paper | Esmalte, fluorescent |
| Perforation | imperforate, self-adhesive |
| Print Technique | Offset lithography |
| Printed by | Amiel and SMD vending machines |
| Quantity | N/A |
| Issuing Authority | CTT - Correios de Portugal |
| Change of postal rates on dinosaur ATM stamps of Portugal between 1999 and 2003 | ||||||||
| Year of issue | Without additional label (regular mail) |
"Correio Azul" (priority mail) |
Vending machines used in Portugal in 2000 and 2001, from left to right:
|
|||||
| Domestic [1] | Spain | Europe, except Spain | Rest of the world | Domestic | International | |||
| up to 20g. | up to 100g. | up to 20g. | up to 20g. | up to 20g. | up to 20g. | up to 20g. | ||
| 1999 | *50.00* | *85.00* | *95.00* | *100.00* | *140.00* | *80.00* | *350.00* | |
| 2000 | *50.00$ | *85.00$ | *90.00$ | *100.00$ | *140.00$ | *85.00$ | *350.00$ | |
| *50.00$ / €0.25 | *85.00$ / €0.42 | *90.00$ / €0.45 | *100.00$ / €0.50 | *140.00$ / €0.70 | *85.00$ / €0.42 | *350.00$ / €1.75 | ||
| 2001 | *50.00$ / €0.25 | *85.00$ / €0.42 | *95.00$ / €0.45 | *105.00$ / €0.50 | *140.00$ / €0.70 | *80.00$ / €0.42 | *350.00$ / €1.75 | |
| 2002 | €0.27 | €0.45 | €0.46 | €0.54 | €0.70 | €0.43 | €1.75 | |
![]() |
| "*105.00$ / €0.50" ATM stamp of AMIEL vending machine from 2001. |
| Amiel SIMA 1020 text | SMD MSPost VE 50 text | NewVision Epost 2000 text |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| SMD stamp: thin and small face value | AMIEL stamp: bold and large face value. The stamp on the right used coma separator and has currency conversion error (€0.40 instead of €0.42) | |
No official FDCs or other philatelic products were issued by the Portuguese Post for the dinosaur ATM stamps after their introduction in 1999. The FDCs shown below were created by collectors or dealers, using either commemorative covers from 1999 or ordinary envelopes bearing postmarks dated on the first day of issue of the ATM stamps with double face values.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| FDC with SMD stamps. | Additional stamp of Escudo 30 was added on the reverse side of each cover. | |
| Example of circulated covers and postcards | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| The stamps on these covers exhibit a comma separator in the euro price. | Cover posted in 2001, bearing one error stamp showing the value “85$/€0.40”, instead of “85$/€0.42”. | A cover posted in 2004. Two of the stamps have an error stamp: "*85$/€0.82" |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Postcards with stamps showing the 2001 error face value “105.00$ / €0.52”, which should have been “105.00$ / €0.50”. | ||
![]() |
In this case, the customer selected one or more fees for printing, but the machine failed to dispense
the labels.
Although the fees were successfully processed and charged, the printed labels remained trapped inside
the machine.
When this happened, the customer was left without both the money and the labels,
and the terminal immediately went out of service.
Recovery of the fees or the missing labels was only possible by requesting assistance and filing
a complaint with a postal worker.
A distinctive feature of this malfunction is that the machine often printed multiple fee impressions
on a single label, creating highly unusual production errors such as the multi-impression examples shown
here.
These pieces are the direct result of the printer continuing to operate while the labels failed
to advance or exit the dispenser.
In theory, such an error could happen by programming the vending machine to the new currency,
but this issue should have been recognized by the maintenance staff,
who should have printed some test value stamps to check for errors.
These stamps have very clear text with strong colors, in comparison to other stamps with correct values.
Probably, the error was created on demand by the staff for some fellow collectors or dealers.
These stamps were most likely created through deliberate manipulation by machine-service staff,
who inserted short strips in the wrong orientation
either at the request of collectors or dealers, or simply to profit from producing such varieties.
According to several Portuguese specialists in ATM stamps, it is impossible to insert an entire roll
and print it in reverse.
Instead, the operator would have to cut a strip of labels from the roll,
apply adhesive to the back, attach the strip upside down onto the remaining roll,
and then feed it into the machine, when machine was open.
Nevertheless, a few examples of stamps with inverted text have been found on genuinely
circulated covers and postcards.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| <prev | back to index | next> |